Banner Image
Running a business

Power law: The startup founder’s guide to making your first Legal hire

  • Running a business
  • Article
  • 6 minutes read

In this article lawyers with in-house experience discuss exactly when startups should think about making their first legal hire, and what traits equip a lawyer for success at young, dynamic companies.

  1. Although hiring is a priority area for most founders, making a first in-house Legal hire poses a unique challenge.
  2. Factors like headcount and the complexity of the regulations in your sector should be considered.
  3. Experienced hires offer strategic input, while enthusiastic lawyers on a learning curve tend to get stuck in; get the best of both by welcoming a senior lawyer as an angel investor.

Startup founders tend to spend a lot of their time focusing on hiring. The most successful founders can quickly identify key skills and red flags in areas way outside their core competency: think of a technical founder hiring a sales leader, for example.

But making a first in-house Legal hire is an especially delicate decision.

Most founders have no direct experience in law, so how can they identify what kind of lawyer will best suit their business? Should the first Legal hire be an experienced General Counsel (GC), or someone at an earlier stage in their career? And what happens to your external law firm: how will you define their responsibilities once you’ve appointed an in-house lawyer?

Getting these questions right is important because a strong Legal hire can transform your approach to key milestones like funding rounds and acquisitions. Not only that – an in-house legal counsel is often a critical partner to the CEO and Board when it comes to corporate governance and risk management.

We talked to experienced lawyers to find out when to make that first Legal hire, and what qualities to look out for.

“Many founders will assess their plans and upcoming corporate milestones, potentially targeting a legal hire in advance of, for instance, an upcoming funding round. There is nothing wrong with being pragmatic and reacting to a business need, as long as the founder has a solid plan for where their new legal joiner is going to add value over the longer term, not just as extra resource for a specific short- or medium-term goal.”

Bianca Stewart, Director of Legal, Motorway

Founders should also consider the nature of their sector. Startups operating in verticals with lighter regulation may not need an in-house Legal resource as early as companies in highly-regulated spaces like fintech or aviation.

“Founders are often nervous about making a legal hire because, bluntly, lawyers tend to be expensive. But the upside of a senior lawyer who understands a fast-changing regulatory environment is huge.”

Anushka Herath, Associate General Counsel, HSBC Innovation Banking

Unsure whether a full-time hire is the right step? There are alternative options, says Edward Bird, founder and CEO of legal tech startup Solomonic.

“Nowadays there are more lawyers than ever practising as portfolio GCs, who spend a day or two per week working with a small number of clients. This might be a useful and cost-effective model for startups keen to test the water.”

Edward Bird, Founder and CEO, Solomonic

“A massive difference between private practice and in-house is the degree of flexibility lawyers need to build into their decision-making. Of course adhering to the law is non-negotiable, but having a can-do mentality and showing a willingness to think creatively is likely to be an indicator of success for in-house lawyers.”

Bianca Stewart, Director of Legal, Motorway

"Instead, law firms can be engaged to provide forward-looking guidance on the risk and compliance environment, especially in fast-moving sectors. Because they have relationships right across the market, they may be able to scan the horizon more effectively than a General Counsel or Head of Legal who has to focus to a much greater extent on the company’s priorities."

Anushka Herath, Associate General Counsel, HSBC Innovation Banking

Understanding your law firm’s attitude to the day-to-day work is likely to inform how and when they will add value: “As a startup it’s never good to feel like you’ll get a bill every time you send your law firm an email,” says Bianca. To Anushka, failing to set clear boundaries works against the interests of all parties: “When the balance is wrong, an in-house lawyer can end up acting as a highly-paid go-between for the law firm and the founders. That isn’t an effective use of anyone’s time.”

And an internal lawyer can add value to a huge range of processes across functions, observes Edward. “A good lawyer can execute at speed. In addition to their core responsibilities, that skillset is invaluable to, for example, your sales success. I’ve often seen strong legal work, delivered at pace, be the difference between winning and losing a deal.”

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of HSBC Innovation Banking or any of its affiliates.